Electors:

Is an Electoral College or Court Challenge Against

Mr. Obama Justified?

 

This issue has only intensified because Mr. Obama will not allow anyone access to certified copies of his records. He has perpetuated this crisis and you, as an Elector, can demand that he clear it up before your independent vote is cast.

 

·       The 20th Amendment identifies the Electoral College as the place and time to challenge a candidate’s credentials (age and citizenship).

·       Despite much public demand, Mr. Obama has not provided access to a classic Birth Certificate that proves the actual place of birth[i] (His campaign’s web site “short form” version simply does not address this question – He must deliver the certified long form.  See the critical difference for yourself below).

·       Electors have a right to request credentials of a candidate in Court and also before the Electoral College with Congress as adjudicators.

·       Electors have a duty to their country over any pledge to their party to vote their conscience. Voter intimidation by the party is illegal. If you cannot act independently then your “vote” is only a sham rubber stamp. You must be certain without a doubt that the candidate meets the natural born and age requirements.

 

Our Founding Fathers placed in the Constitution restrictions on who can be President and Commander in Chief.  It was deemed wise to restrict that post to natural born individuals without dual citizenships.  The 20th amendment identified the time prior to inauguration for challenges to be made to the qualifications of Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates.

 

In this missive, a clear unimpeachable argument is made that Barack Obama has yet to provide support for the proposition that he meets that Constitutional bar and that, as gatekeepers of the Constitution, the Electors from each state have a moral and Constitutional obligation to review this matter, to obtain the evidence that would remove any doubt one way or the other, and, then and only then, cast their Electoral Ballot for President.

 

Despite any pressure from your party officials to bundle your vote and cast en masse, you have the right to know and the right to cast that ballot as your conscience and the Constitution demand. Country loyalty demands that this Constitutional obligation take precedence over party loyalty and party rules.

 

As it stands, no one, not even non-citizens are barred from the ballot.  The Socialist Workers Party, VP candidate Roger Calaro, for example, is a Nicaraguan having only a green card, yet his name appears on many states’ ballots.  This fact astounds most people.  It turns out that no government agency is currently tasked with preventing such fraud or of even identifying that fact to any unsuspecting voters; no, not the Secretaries of State nor the Federal Elections Commission.  The gatekeepers of the constitution are the voters - and then the Electors, as they weigh in at the Electoral College.  Only Electors and candidates themselves can bring forward challenges, and those challenges can be judged by the Courts, or if brought up in the Electoral College, then Congress is the final judge, similar to an impeachment trial.

 

If you agree that you want to know – really know for sure before you cast your Electoral Vote, then add your name to a growing list of Electoral College Electors who will be represented in a suit filed with the Supreme Court and also with the Electoral College itself.  You deserve to know whether the President-elect is a “natural born” citizen[ii].

 

Any reasonable man or woman would acknowledge that reasonable, even significant doubt exists.  Here is the evidence to this qualification problem in a nutshell. Additional reading is contained in links.

 

The document on the left is what Mr. Obama’s campaign displayed on a web site.  It is a computer database printout which has none of the detail required to answer the question of actual place of birth. He displayed the kind of document Hawaiian residents can get for their foreign born children.

 

Obama Certification                             

Normal Certificate

 

Note: No hospital, No Midwife, No Doctor, No Place, NOT Traceable. Does not answer the question!

Note: Witnesses! Real Places where even more traceable information like birthing records for the mother are kept.

 

Really, it’s that simple. Demand to see the real Birth Certificate or at least the documentation behind the digital online Certification document.  While some have argued about the web document’s authenticity, that question really is moot.  Real or not it does not answer the question. The only way to get a solid and definitive answer is to see the original hard-copy document.

 

Obama has not yet properly disclosed the one document that would remove all doubt and properly vet him for the position he has pursued. He simply has not done this yet.

 

 

You, however, an Elector, are some of the few people on the planet who actually have the right, the power, and the leverage to demand the answer. Join the growing list of Electors who will demand this question be answered before the college meets in December.

 

 

For further reading:  http://peoplespassions.org/    :  http://peoplespassions.org/Exhibits
Does
it matter where he was born?  Wasn’t at least his mother a US Citizen? 

 

 

In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended, required the following: A child being born to one alien parent (i.e.; Non Citizen) and one citizen parent in a marital relationship required the sole US citizen parent to have resided in the United States for a period of ten years, five of which must have been over the age of 14.  Today's version of the law has somewhat different residency requirements for the US citizen parent.  But the law, as it applied on August 4, 1961, required ten years presence, five after the age of 14.

At the time of Barack Hussein Obama II's birth on August 4, 1961, Ms. Dunham was 18 years old, having been born in November of 1942. As such, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born outside the US or its Outlying Possessions on August 4, 1961, then Ms. Dunham could not have transmitted her citizenship to her foreign-born son because she failed to have accumulated the necessary physical presence requirements that the LAW demanded.


It's that simple.  If he was born abroad, then he is not, nor can he ever be eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America, inasmuch as he does not, nor can he ever fulfill the requirements of Article II, Clause V, of the Constitution of the United States.  This is not an optional requirement, it is the law, and evidence shows that Mr. Obama does not fulfill it, whether or not some thinks it is unfair.

Now, the question remains to be answered if he was born abroad or not.  The State of Hawaii has weighed in and states that there is a record of Mr. Obama's birth on file in the Department of Vital Statistics.  However, THAT is not enough. Since there are two distinct birth documents issued by the State of Hawaii[iii] – which one do they have?  They gave less detail than what the published document details.

 

What is troubling and frustrating is that Obama can (and has had the ability to do so for quite some time) resolve this matter by simply providing a certified copy of his authentic birth document.  The only answer that is reasonable for his failure to do so is that he simply does not have a document that shows he was born in the United States.

 

You, as an Elector, have the right and the obligation to our country to join hands and ask that this matter be put to rest.  You can, in good conscience, vote uninhibited for the qualified candidate of your choice.  Without your effort, this cloud of illegitimacy will hang unabated over the Presidency.  Join with us in demanding the answers.  Isn't it, after all, a fairly simple question?  We all deserve a simple answer.

 

If you find that the evidence in this attachment DOES cause reasonable doubt on your part, we ask you to mail in the enclosed petition which requests that Congress vet Senator Obama’s constitutional qualifications forthwith.  You can additionally sign the petition online at the following website:  http://www.rallycongress.com/the-peoples-voice/ .  If you feel, however, that there isn’t reasonable doubt, I want to thank you for taking the time to study the evidence.  Certainly, we all want to be sure that Senator Obama is a natural born citizen.

 

For further reading:  http://peoplespassions.org/    :  http://peoplespassions.org/Exhibits


 



[i] A growing number of questions have arisen in litigation in at least 10 states contesting whether Senator John McCain or Senator Barack Obama are “natural born” citizens and, therefore, constitutionally eligible to be entrusted with the Office of President of the United States. In the litigation against Senator Obama, allegations have been made that his admitted dual citizenship in Indonesia, and lack of evidence that he renounced the same, caused a loss of his United States Citizenship as a matter of law. All these questions about both of the candidates are still unresolved. In the course of those lawsuits, it has been determined that there exists no designated official in the federal government, or the government of the states, directly charged with the responsibility of determining whether any Presidential candidate meets the qualifications of Article II of the Constitution of the United States. In most states, that responsibility is vested with the political parties, all of which have a conflict of interest in making any such determination, and none of which have been forthcoming with information or evidence verifying any candidate’s compliance with the eligibility requirements.

 

[ii] 3 United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 8 provides, “The electors shall vote for President and Vice President, respectively, in the manner directed by the Constitution.” This federal statute confers upon each elector an affirmative duty to discover whether the candidate for President for which the elector is seeking election is a “natural born” citizen. Otherwise, the elector would not know if his vote was being cast in the “manner directed by the Constitution.”

 

[iii] A press release was issued on October 31, 2008, by the Hawaii Department of Health by its Director, Dr. Chiyome Fukino. Dr. Fukino said that she had “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Senator Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” That statement failed to resolve any of the questions being raised by litigation and press accounts. 

That brief comment does not affirm whether the birth certificate in the “record” is a Certification of Live Birth or a Certificate of Hawaiian Birth. In Hawaii, a Certificate of Live Birth resulting from hospital documentation, including a signature of an attending physician, is different from a Certification of Live Birth. For births prior to 1972, a Certification of Live Birth was the result of the uncorroborated testimony of one witness and was not generated by a hospital. Such a Certificate could be obtained up to one year from the date of the child’s birth. For that reason, its value as prima facie evidence is limited and could be overcome if any of the allegations of substantial evidence of birth outside Hawaii can be obtained. The vault (long Version) birth certificate, per Hawaiian Statute 883.176 allows the birth in another State or another country to be registered in Hawaii. Box 7C of the vault Certificate of Live Birth contains a question, whether the birth was in Hawaii or another State or Country.  Therefore, the only way to verify the exact location of birth is to review a certified copy of the original vault Copy.